Cing-Yang Meng vs Mikal Statham Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 05:43 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Meng vs M. Statham

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NZL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Meng 1 - 0 Statham
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cing-Yang Meng winning 2 and Mikal Statham winning 1. The last match between Cing-Yang Meng and Mikal Statham was at the M25 Qian Daohu, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Cing-Yang Meng getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Meng | 1 |
| Statham | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Qian Daohu(10-29-25)
C. Meng vs M. Statham H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $600 |
| 49.78% (112-113) | Career Total W/L | 38.73% (79-125) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Meng vs M. Statham Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Cing-Yang Meng has won 26.19% of points on their second serve, compared to Mikal Statham, who has not won any. How might this influence the match outcome? It suggests a potential advantage for Meng.
- Return Game Stats: Recent form indicates that Meng has won 37.50% of their opponent’s second serve points and 29.17% of first serve returns, while Statham remains at 0% for both. Does this mean Meng is the stronger returner? The stats lean towards "yes."
- Under Pressure: Meng has successfully saved 44.00% of breakpoints in recent matches. Conversely, Statham has saved none. Can saving breakpoints be a crucial factor? This statistic could prove decisive in tight games.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Mikal Statham has a higher match win rate at 68.42% compared to Meng's 50.00%. Could this suggest overall consistency? Statham appears more consistent in terms of match victories.
- Best Surface: Meng excels on Clay with a 56% win rate, whereas Statham’s best is on Hard courts at 56%. Which surface gives Meng an edge? Clay surfaces seem to favor Meng.
- Player Level: Both players frequently compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with Meng winning 50% and Statham 68.42% of those matches. What does this say about their competition level? Statham might be more accustomed to winning at this level.
- Opponent Quality: Over the last year, Meng faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging rank 144 compared to Statham’s 196.58. Does this exposure to higher-level opponents benefit Meng? Potentially, yes.
- Deciding Set Performance: Meng has won every deciding set in the past year, whereas Statham has won 83%. How significant could this be if the match extends to a deciding set? Meng might have the psychological edge.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Cing-Yang Meng and Mikal Statham appears to set the stage for a competitive encounter. Meng has shown superior performance in second serve and return game stats over recent months, signaling a potential edge in maintaining rally control and turning serve opportunities into points.
Additionally, in high-pressure situations like breakpoints, Meng seems more resilient, having saved a notable percentage compared to Statham's zero. The capacity to save breakpoints could be pivotal in crucial match moments.
However, Statham's overall higher yearly win percentage suggests a consistency in securing match victories, with a predilection for performing well on hard surfaces. Yet, in a potential deciding set scenario, Meng's flawless record may hint at a psychological advantage.
Weighing these factors, Cing-Yang Meng's ability to effectively manage serve points and demonstrate composure under pressure positions them as the probable victor in this matchup.
Cing-Yang Meng vs Mikal Statham Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Meng vs M. Statham H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 12 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:2:8 | Average Match Time | 2:2:8 |
| 61% (46/75) | 1st Serve % | 71% (57/80) |
| 70% (32/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (36/57) |
| 59% (17/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (15/23) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 36% (29/80) | Return Points Win % | 35% (26/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Meng Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-4 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 2-6 6-4 10-6 | ||
M. Statham Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 2-6 10-6 | ||
Q1 | L | w/o | ||
Q2 | L | w/o | ||

C. Meng vs M. Statham Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.78% (112/113) | YTD Win/Loss | 38.73% (79/125) |
| 49.30% (248/255) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.47% (192/271) |
| 49.64% (2341/2375) | Games Win/Loss | 47.78% (2012/2199) |
| 48.63% (71/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.07% (69/95) |
| 55.71% (39/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.30% (10/23) |
| 22.22% (2/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 265 | Aces Total | 59 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 315 | Total Double Faults | 70 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 334.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.58 |
| 68% (6393/9363) | 1st Serve % | 66% (1132/1705) |
| 62% (3991/6393) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (668/1132) |
| 49% (1440/2969) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (283/572) |
| 42% (320/761) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (60/138) |
| 37% (3245/8882) | Return Points Win % | 37% (606/1630) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 22.22% (2/7) | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 50.93% (110/106) | Futures W/L | 39.34% (72/111) |
| 51% (110/216) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (79/204) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (25/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (13/37) |
| 59% (35/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (21/55) |
| 86% (111/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (84/70) |
| 14% (111/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (84/14) |
| 14% (114/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (120/9) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
